A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out between possible neighbours above the development of a wall at a coastal web-site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which includes captivated national consideration next an Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on the proposed family residence at Sutton Strand, wherever allegations of planning breaches, environmental considerations, and extended-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods posting about René Collier and also the Irish Instances report about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has developed into a very publicised legal battle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the positioning on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a business director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, exactly where advancement pressures collide with environmental protections along with the sensitivities of founded people. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being built by their prospective neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted below preparing permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their planning authorization by creating a wall past the boundaries of their web page, bringing about an encroachment over a Particular Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central towards the dispute, as a result spots are topic to strict controls under European and Irish environmental law. Inside their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological effects, significantly within a delicate coastal environment for example Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their arranging authorization, and say the wall, which is partially developed, is in the right situation. Their lawful workforce has characterised the motion as an attempt to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of trying to find to halt homebuilding in order to preserve their see, an allegation that has been repeated in court and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal setting up disputes, where by sights of the sea are equally hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained remarkable attempts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, according to sworn proof referenced from the Irish Periods. In one account, Rene Collier waded via midsection-superior drinking water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has because turn out to be emblematic of your intensity of the dispute. These steps were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence of your wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult men entered the water through extreme climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading via storm drinking water to photograph the site grew to become one of the most hanging descriptions to arise from court docket reporting. The Irish Instances short article about accountant Paul Feely noted that these kinds of steps were cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ perception which the wall prolonged into an area affected by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was staying encroached on.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 had been lined intimately via the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Moments January 27 2026 grew to become commonly searched phrases as readers sought to be familiar with the background and implications of the case. On that day, the High Court read additional submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant during the lawful timeline.
For the Main on the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances hooked up on the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both of those pressured that their action is determined by problem for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal check out, insisting instead that it's about ensuring that progress at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've explained their extended-standing relationship to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a few simply looking to create a household home in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches over a Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective have already been completed dependant on Skilled information and approved programs. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how setting up disputes are fixed in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute around construction of wall at coastal site has become a shorthand description for a scenario that a lot of observers see as more and more typical. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation amongst private land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats is now a lot more contentious.
The Irish Occasions post about René Collier noted which the businessman had Beforehand been involved with neighborhood advocacy on preparing and environmental issues, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Times short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from extremely distinctive Specialist backgrounds can find by themselves aligned in this kind of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site as some experiences spell their names, are becoming synonymous Together with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site from your sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded through waistline-superior water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Situations are phrases that appeared frequently in coverage, reflecting equally the Actual physical truth of the coastline and also the symbolic character on the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket ought to determine whether or not the wall as built complies with planning authorization and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and preparing circumstances. Yet the human ingredient continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside alongside one another extended after the lawful fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development operates at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case prolong past that address. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal progress. In addition, it underscores how quickly a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential troubles such as environmental safety and assets rights are perceived being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains an area of natural splendor and contested boundaries. The wall within the centre in the dispute stands partly crafted, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized issues. Whether or not it is going to finally be altered, removed, or finished as planned will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to one of the most intently viewed scheduling disputes in north Dublin recently.