A bitter High Court dispute has broken out concerning potential neighbours about the construction of the wall in a coastal web-site within a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national notice subsequent an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed relatives residence at Sutton Strand, where by allegations of organizing breaches, environmental problems, and extensive-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Moments posting about René Collier and also the Irish Occasions posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has developed into a hugely publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing around development is effective at the website on Dublin Road, Sutton, exactly where Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and an organization director respectively, find to build their loved ones household. The situation is becoming emblematic of wider disputes alongside Ireland’s coastline, in which improvement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of set up residents. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting constructed by their future neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted under scheduling permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both inhabitants of Dublin Road, assert that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms in their preparing authorization by building a wall outside of the boundaries in their internet site, leading to an encroachment on the Special Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to the dispute, as a result areas are matter to demanding controls beneath European and Irish environmental regulation. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They may be in breach in their setting up authorization, and say the wall, that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been recurring in court docket and referenced in protection of the situation. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal arranging disputes, wherever sights of the sea are the two hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described remarkable attempts from the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the site, Based on sworn proof referenced during the Irish Situations. In one account, Rene Collier waded by means of waist-high h2o all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Occasions, a picture which has because become emblematic of your intensity of your dispute. These actions were not just symbolic; they had been meant to Obtain Visible evidence on the wall’s placement relative to tidal lines and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location from your sea Irish Times noted, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the site turned The most hanging descriptions to arise from courtroom reporting. The Irish Occasions post about accountant Paul Feely noted that such steps had been cited to exhibit the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was remaining encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included intimately from the national push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Accountant Paul Feely Periods January 27 2026 turned extensively searched phrases as viewers sought to understand the history and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court heard further submissions on irrespective of whether interim orders really should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a vital instant in the authorized timeline.
At the core of your dispute is really a disagreement over boundaries, arranging compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain the wall, as built, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has been called meticulous in his examination of arranging documents, maps, and problems hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally pressured that their motion is inspired by issue for environmental protection and adherence to preparing legislation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public view, insisting alternatively that it's about making sure that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they have got explained their very long-standing relationship to the region as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple simply attempting to create a loved ones residence in accordance Together with the regulation. They deny that the wall encroaches with a Exclusive Space of Conservation and say that each one functions have been completed determined by Qualified guidance and authorised ideas. Their attorneys have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the remarkable actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea all through a storm, usually do not change the underlying information.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal website is becoming a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as increasingly frequent. As sea stages rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation amongst non-public land, public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become extra contentious.
The Irish Instances article about René Collier pointed out that the businessman experienced previously been involved with regional advocacy on preparing and environmental problems, however not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Occasions article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from extremely unique professional backgrounds can find on their own aligned in these kinds of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have become synonymous Along with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website with the sea Irish Instances coverage emphasised, underlining The bizarre lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded as a result of midsection-substantial drinking water during a storm to photograph the location Irish Times and René Collier waded by way of midsection-higher drinking water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting each the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters with the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an abnormal approach.
As the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket must figure out whether or not the wall as constructed complies with arranging permission and no matter if any encroachment right into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are complicated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal information, and arranging circumstances. However the human aspect continues to be central: neighbours who ought to Dwell together with one another very long following the legal prices have been paid.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than building is effective at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, but the implications of the situation prolong further than that tackle. For planners, developers, and citizens alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the importance of clarity in planning permissions and sensitivity in coastal development. In addition, it underscores how swiftly a local disagreement can escalate when essential difficulties for example environmental security and house legal rights are perceived for being at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a location of normal splendor and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre of the dispute stands partially designed, a Actual physical manifestation of unresolved authorized inquiries. Whether or not it is going to in the long run be altered, taken out, or accomplished as planned will rely on the court’s results. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will most likely continue to seem in headlines, linked indelibly to Among the most intently watched scheduling disputes in north Dublin lately.